Yesterday, Google announced two new link attributes:
rel="sponsored": Use the sponsored attribute to identify links on your site that were created as part of advertisements, sponsorships or other compensation agreements.
rel="ugc": UGC stands for User Generated Content, and the ugc attribute value is recommended for links within user generated content, such as comments and forum posts.
Today, we’ve announced two new link attributes - “sponsored” and “ugc” - that join “nofollow” as ways to identify the nature of links. All will now work as hints about which links Google Search should consider or exclude for ranking purposes. More details:https://t.co/V6X2xjEC5L
— Google Webmasters (@googlewmc) September 10, 2019
These are in addition to our 15 year-old friend rel="nofollow".
Since the SEO community is buzzing over this announcement, I figured I'd share a few of my thoughts on the subject.
TL;DR: Nothingburger for most law firms.
A few warnings and disclaimers. This announcement happened yesterday. Anyone claiming to have this sorted out just did you a huge favor, you reduce their credibility to little, or if you're smart, none. Furthermore, Google is not your friend, team member, or consultant. Take everything they say and do with a grain of salt. Yes, even the super-friendly Googlers and Xooglers who are exceptionally generous with their time and knowledge. Finally, read the fine print here and think about it in the context of how it helps Google, not you, your business, etc.
Let's parse.
Google's stated reason for the original nofollow attribute is to fight comment spam. In my view, it gets a "meh" at best. Sure, it purportedly removed SEO link value from spam comments, but it didn't do much in terms of actually deterring spammers from commenting. In fact, a lot of sites have altogether removed comments from their sites / blogs, thanks spammers.
But, here's something actually interesting:
When nofollow was introduced, Google would not count any link marked this way as a signal to use within our search algorithms. This has now changed. All the link attributes -- sponsored, UGC and nofollow -- are treated as hints about which links to consider or exclude within Search. We’ll use these hints -- along with other signals -- as a way to better understand how to appropriately analyze and use links within our systems.
Whoa! Hold the phone. Google is saying, "while we used to not count nofollow links, now we'll count them (and these other attributes) as hints."
How can this be a nothingburger? Because we've been skeptical about the zero value of nofollow for years. This is particularly true in the context of local SEO.
Look, I'm not getting into the PageRank doesn't count in local debate. Bottom-line: meh, links.
Not, "meh, dofollow links." Not, "meh, high DA links." And now, not "meh, non-sponsored and non-ugc links." Admittedly those sentences are awkward. But you get it.
Want to rank in local? Earn links. Quality links as defined by relevance.
You should go read the rest of Google's answers relating to this announcement. I doubt that this will have much impact on deterring spammers. It is yet to be seen whether it will have much impact on combating spam links from actually helping rank sites (hint: probably not much).
In any event, you shouldn't just take Google's word for it. You shouldn't take my word for it either. Go test yourself!
Okay, I have to admit, the SEO nerd in me thinks this is really cool. It's rare that Google makes an announcement like this, particularly with respect to links. I have some hunches as to why they're doing this, but let's not go down those rabbit holes quite yet. Keep your eyes peeled, and keep building links!
P.S. For crawling and indexing purposes, nofollow will become a hint as of March 1, 2020.
See you next spring.
Over the years, law firm prospects have sent us reports from just about all of our competitors. Unfortunately, even today, some law firm marketing agencies still mislead their clients via "reporting." One particularly egregious example comes in the form of ranking reports. Which prompted this LinkedIn post. To my surprise, I received a lot of […]
John Wanamaker supposedly said "Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half." In an an effort to figure out "what half is working," attribution was born. Coupled with a transition from traditional, offline ads to digital media, attribution became the holy grail for analyzing advertising spends. But […]
I recently asked ChatGPT, "What are some of the top personal injury law firms in Chicago?? Actually, first I ask "who are some of the top personal injury lawyers in Chicago?" ChatGPT couldn't handle that one, so I modified the prompt. ChatGPT listed five very well-known firms downtown. Can you guess the other four? That's […]
If you're like me, you have some degree of AI, ChatGBT, Bard, exhaustion. Now don't get me wrong, this is stuff is remarkable and is changing, well, a lot. But before you hook up the ChatGPT API to your WordPress API and crank out 10,000 pages, here are a few things to think about. Let's […]
If you know me, you know my opinions about links and SEO advice from Google. If you don't, here's the TL;DR: Meh, links! Meaning, all things being equal, links still remain a competitive difference maker for ranking. Take Google's SEO advice with several grains of salt. Google has no economic incentive to help your site […]
The best marketing advice I can give you is to be authentic. Of course, you don't find that very helpful in terms of meeting your growth goals. So, you might decide to game the system. As I'm writing this, one of the more popular ways to gain the system is to pay for engagement. This […]
The following post was written by ChatGPT. ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is a state-of-the-art language model that can generate human-like text based on a given prompt or context. This technology has the potential to revolutionize the way that businesses, including law firms, market themselves to potential clients. One way that a law firm could use […]
How long does SEO take? When can I expect to see results? What results should I expect to see? These are all reasonable questions that we field from lawyers every day. And, like many legal answers, the answer is: It depends. Yes, I know that's not the answer you wanted. But it's the most honest […]
And how much time should they spend doing it? I recently had the privilege of chatting with Tyson, Jim, and Conrad for an upcoming episode of The Maximum Lawyer Podcast. If you're not familiar with The Maximum Lawyer community, you should definitely check it out. Jim asked a really great question about who should do […]
